chipsandegg
newbie
Reged: 25/06/2008
Posts: 29
|
|
Hi all,
I was wondering can anyone help me? i currently have the original Nike SQ which i am happy with and feel hit quite consistantly to about 250 - 260 yards. what i was wondering was ,has anyone tried the new Nike SQ Sumo 5000 or the square one (5900 i think) and could let me know whether or not are they an improvement on the driver i already have? When i bought my driver i tried out a number of drivers first and found i hit the Nike one a lot more consistantly (although i wasnt over keen on its looks or sound i thought , hey if it works!)so am quite sure that the Nike is for me, am just a little unsure whether it is going to be worth spending my money on something that offers little or no improvement?
Thanks as always guys, ur always a great help
Andy 
--------------------
Nike SQ
Nike SQ #3
Taylormade Rescue Dual 2&4
Ping S58 5,6,7,8,9,PW,
Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54,60
Scotty Cameron Laguna
|
Doh
member
Reged: 01/11/2007
Posts: 173
Loc: cheshire
|
|
If your happy with your driver dont change it all the square drivers are made for people who are a bit wayward off the tee thet tend to hit it straighter but this tends to take a little distance off.
|
Parmo
veteran
Reged: 03/10/2007
Posts: 1408
Loc: Leeds, UK
|
|
Hi Andy,
I tried the nike SQ's and found the "normal" looking one better than the square, try the Yonex nanospeed I as it has ther mechanics of a sqaure driver but the classic looks, it goes a country miles and is straight due to the machanics and sounds pretty decent.
--------------------
Yonex Nano Speed I 12*
Ben Ross V6 Trimas 3 wood
Titleist 906 F4 5 wood
Wilson DH6 19*
Mizuno MX19 3-SW
Srixon WG-706 52*
Yes! Tiffany
Srixon AD333
Hcp: 16 23/08/2008
|
realgolferuk
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 19/08/2007
Posts: 2467
|
|
I'm not as good as you Andy....but I tried a Callaway FT-i and although it seemed quite straight it didn't seem to hit the ball as nicely as my G5 or FT-3. It could simply be because it's hard to feel you've "middled one" with one of these square beasts. i.i.r.c. the Callaway had a tad longer shaft but certainly didn't give me any extra distance.
I say if we/I can find something comfy that goes a decent distance for our standard/swing (in my case 230-250 with 90 mph) and pretty straight, maybe best to find other areas to work on.
--------------------
Dave
h'cap 12 .
Member of the Tommy Armour 845 appreciation
society (current membership 2!)
Nothing in the bag.....I just look at the ball and it goes straight....into the trees!!!
|
Cernunnos
enthusiast
Reged: 15/07/2008
Posts: 331
Loc: Burton
|
|
I Really rate Nike gear, having tried the original SQ's on demo days & know what setup I would need if I had one. Thing is I've used Nike gear before (CPRII set) & although got on very well with it, its something to do with the asthetics of their clubs & the fact a Mr T Woods uses Nike has for a long time put me off using Nike again, though must admit I might consider Nike in the future if I see something more classic looking, especially now that Brit players are now getting sponsorships from them.
Do like the lower face look of some of the newer drivers, including Nike. OK, its generally an optical illusion, though I'm now able again to tee lower with my new Dd6+, so not entirely an illusion.
--------------------
H'Cap... Several inches between the ears.
Wilson Staff Dd6+ 10.5' Yonex Cyberstar mII 3 & 5 fairway woods
Yonex C280 3-SW irons
NV Drew 50' low bounce Titleiest 60' 4'bounce
Yes Tracy Putter
Srixon Trispeed & TaylorMade Tp-Burner balls
Bennington Bag. Mottocady S1 Mk1
FJ-AQL shoes
|
andiritchie
enthusiast
Reged: 13/05/2008
Posts: 366
Loc: wigan
|
|
like you andy i had the first nike sasquatch which was a really good driver only changed as the shaft was a bit whippy for me,i have hit ne nike 5000 with the graffloy epic shaft in it(think that was the name) and it was much better as i could keep it under control,but it might just be the shaft not the head as it went a similar distance to the old one,if you do get one let me know how you get on with it because it looks like thats my next choice of driver
--------------------
Whats in my bag
cleveland hibore xls 9.5 proforce v2 x stiff
mizuno f50 3 wood dynamic gold x100
ping g10 21deg rescue x stiff pro launch red
titleist 695cb 4-pw 6.5 project x
titleist vokey 52
titleist vokey spin milled 56 and 60
scotty cameron studio stainless newport2.5
bridgestone b330-s
|
Parmo
veteran
Reged: 03/10/2007
Posts: 1408
Loc: Leeds, UK
|
|
Cernunnos, I agree as I seem to be playing better off the tee with a shallow face driver and a lower tee'd up ball.
--------------------
Yonex Nano Speed I 12*
Ben Ross V6 Trimas 3 wood
Titleist 906 F4 5 wood
Wilson DH6 19*
Mizuno MX19 3-SW
Srixon WG-706 52*
Yes! Tiffany
Srixon AD333
Hcp: 16 23/08/2008
|
GB72
veteran
Reged: 08/05/2007
Posts: 1345
Loc: Rutland
|
|
I tried both the new SQ Sumo and last year's version and found little difference. Ended up buying last year's SUMO SQ for about £120 rather than spebnd and extra £70 on the new model.
--------------------
The Current Bag
Benross VeloCT 10 degree Driver
Adams Insight XTD 3 Wood
Adams Boxer 19 Degree Hybrid
Orka Kii 24 Degree Hybrid (Back in My Good Books)
Orka Kii Irons 5-SW
Nike Tour SV 60 Degree lob Wedge
Benross Pure Red Putter
Wilson Staff PX 3 Balls
Ogio Atlas Bag
www.stokerochfordgolfclub.co.uk
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
