Reader review: Cleveland 588 RTX 2.0 wedges

Two Golf Monthly readers test Cleveland 588 RTX 2.0 wedges

At the end of last year, we gave two Golf Monthly readers the chance to test out Cleveland 588 RTX 2.0 wedges.

The fitting took place at Cleveland Srixon's Centre of Excellence at Studley Wood Golf Club in Oxfordshire.

Click here to see our full Cleveland 588 RTX 2.0 wedge review

Reader 1: Brian Tracey Handicap: 5Home club: Weybrook Park

 Wedge assessment

“My wedges are a mixed bunch and, being fairly tall, I had them all built with extra length as suggested at an iron fitting I had previously. From 90 yards and in my results are very mixed, with shanks possible when playing pitch shots. My bunker play can be an issue; I can usually get the ball out, but my distance control is inconsistent. Around the fringe I use an 8-iron rather than a wedge if possible, as this has a safer outcome.”

Fitter analysis by Martin Conner

“Phil had a 50° and a 56° in his bag, which related to a massive 22-yard gap. We took out the 56° and added a 54° and 58°, which halved the distance gap. Outdoor testing also revealed that Phil took quite shallow divots, so we switched to a low-bounce head that offered more control, especially out of the sand.”

Reader feedback

“Martin immediately identified that I had irregular gaps in my set, so getting that right was key. A lot of my clubs have been extended, so all of the wedges I bought subsequently were made to the same spec. Reducing the length by half an inch meant I was suddenly finding the middle of the face rather than the heel and hosel, which allowed me to hit it crisply more often.”

Reader 2: Phil Munson Handicap: 15 Home Club: Grimsby Golf Club

Wedge assessment

“My wedges are a mixed bunch and, being fairly tall, I had them all built with extra length as suggested at an iron fitting I had previously. From 90 yards and in my results are very mixed, with shanks possible when playing pitch shots. My bunker play can be an issue; I can usually get the ball out, but my distance control is inconsistent. Around the fringe I use an 8-iron rather than a wedge if possible, as this has a safer outcome.”

Fitter analysis by Martin Conner

“Phil had a 50° and a 56° in his bag, which related to a massive 22-yard gap. We took out the 56° and added a 54° and 58°, which halved the distance gap. Outdoor testing also revealed that Phil took quite shallow divots, so we switched to a low-bounce head that offered more control, especially out of the sand.”

Reader feedback

“Martin immediately identified that I had irregular gaps in my set, so getting that right was key. A lot of my clubs have been extended, so all of the wedges I bought subsequently were made to the same spec. Reducing the length by half an inch meant I was suddenly finding the middle of the face rather than the heel and hosel, which allowed me to hit it crisply more often.”