GM regulars Fergus Bisset and Jeremy Ellwood debate the relative merits of both the committee-run and the proprietary golf club.

Is It Better To Be A Member At A Committee-Run Club Or A Proprietary Club?

Committee-Run
says Fergus Bisset

A committee-run golf club is a democracy.

Individuals are elected to represent the membership for a term; to hold the purse strings and make important decisions for the benefit of all members, including themselves.

The committee’s objective is not profit, purely to make the club as good as it can be.

At a proprietary club, the owners will take the members’ requirements and wishes into consideration of course, but their ultimate goal is, quite rightly, to make their business a success.

The question is, would you want to join a club where the principal aim of those in charge is to maximise what each member gets for their subscription, or a club where the principal aim of those in charge is to turn a profit?

I prefer the sound of the former and that’s why I belong to a committee-run golf club.

It’s sometimes suggested the committee-run club lacks continuity when it comes to leadership and governance.

Yes, a committee tends to turnover every few years with new people taking the helm, but I see this as a positive thing.

New enthusiastic members bringing new ideas and energy to the table means the club should never become stuck in a rut.

Plus, a committee-run club can draw upon a wealth of knowledge and experience across many sectors to find a diverse selection of the correct people to represent the needs and wishes of the membership.

And the fact the membership as a whole has the final say on any fundamental issues is another benefit of the committee-run club.

The prospect of any significant changes will be put before the members at the AGM or an EGM and, if the members don’t like the proposals, they can reject them.

The people decide!

A golf club is made what it is by its members.

They are what gives a club its unique character and identity and they should be in control of its destiny.

Is It Better To Be A Member At A Committee-Run Club Or A Proprietary Club?

Proprietary
says Jeremy Ellwood

Even though I’m currently a member of a committee-run club – and very happy with it – these days my feeling is that at many members’ clubs the committee structure can hold things back at a time when big decisions often need to be made more quickly than in the past, and in a more business-like manner, as the golfing landscape continues to evolve.

Short-termism can be a real issue, with incoming committee members looking to make some sort of mark, often very well-intentioned.

But surely what golf clubs really need right now is stability and consistency in the management structure, and more of the long-term strategic planning that, ironically, many such committee members would insist on in their often successful business lives.

Golf needs to respond more quickly to the changing habits and preferences of golfers, and to me, proprietary clubs seem better-placed to make those decisions unhindered by years of tradition and status quo, whether it’s mobile phones on the terrace, jeans in the clubhouse, the introduction of more progressive flexible or lifestyle memberships, or whatever.

Better decisions mean a better member experience.

Proprietary clubs have to listen closely to find out what members want, since to succeed, they need to make sure they are keeping their core clientele happy.

Bad decisions could backfire and hurt them in the pocket, which no business likes.

My 54-year-old heart still probably hankers after the feel of a good old-fashioned members’ club, and thankfully many are now moving in the right direction.

But my head tells me that it is the more business-like proprietary clubs that are more likely to keep golf moving with the times and adapting to the 21st century golf club member’s needs and wishes.